Re: Why no language improvements?
From: Chee Wee (chuacw_at_dontspammerightsecurity.biz)
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: William: "Re: ShareIt?"
- Previous message: Chee Wee: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- In reply to: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Next in thread: Jim Cooper: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:36:39 +0800
On 8 Mar 2005 15:03:08 -0800, "Nick Hodges [TeamB]"
<nickhodges@gmail.com> wrote:
>My point is made: interfaces are not exactly the same as abstract
>classes. I've shown that numerous times. Do I need to show it again?
>I will, but I admit it gets tiresome having to repeat myself all the
>time.
Hmm, but it doesn't get tiresome when you say you're Adonis,
handsome, etc? ;o)
- Next message: William: "Re: ShareIt?"
- Previous message: Chee Wee: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- In reply to: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Next in thread: Jim Cooper: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|