Re: Usefulness of UML?
From: Dave Moore (silverstar69NOSPAM_at_NOSPAMgmail.com)
Date: 03/24/05
- Next message: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]: "Re: Profiler"
- Previous message: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Delphi, .NET, Generics (et al)"
- In reply to: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Usefulness of UML?"
- Next in thread: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Usefulness of UML?"
- Reply: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Usefulness of UML?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:13:22 -0000
"Ingvar Nilsen" <telcontr@online-not-this-part-.no> wrote in message
news:4242b531@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Dave Moore wrote:
>
>> "Ingvar Nilsen" <telcontr@online-not-this-part-.no> wrote in message
>> news:42428a26@newsgroups.borland.com...
>>
>>> Thirdly, my impression is that there is so many UML courses and so many
>>> UML tools overcomplicating everything and thereby giving UML a
>>> bad reputation. UML is rather simple, used the right way.
>>
>>
>> Yes! Finally, someone has come out and said it. I've always thought of
>> UML as basic object-orientated common-sense, and I've always wondered how
>> a multi-million (billion?) pound/dollar industry has grown out of
>> something which is so obvious and so damn, well, excellent.
>
> Have you seen the XML books, thick as phone books? Almost in the same
> league. Did you ever see an "INI-files Bible"? Well, XML is a little
> more complicated, but not as complicated as some want it to be.
Yes, I have one sitting on my desk. Worthy of being categorised as a "tome".
"Professional XML", its called, a big red book with approximately 1400 pages
by, oh, about fourteen seperate authors. And I've opened and used it about
twice in three years. Because, at the end of it, if you can understand HTML,
you can get XML almost instantly (well, I did).
Best,
Dave
- Next message: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]: "Re: Profiler"
- Previous message: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Delphi, .NET, Generics (et al)"
- In reply to: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Usefulness of UML?"
- Next in thread: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Usefulness of UML?"
- Reply: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Usefulness of UML?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|