Re: Borland Delphi + 64Bits
From: Jens Gruschel (nospam_at_thisurldoesnotexist.com)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Delphi 2005 upgrade 2... not recommended"
- Previous message: Iman L Crawford: "Re: Delphi 2005 upgrade 2... not recommended"
- In reply to: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Borland Delphi + 64Bits"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Borland Delphi + 64Bits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:36:08 +0200
>>But working with such fields (let's say you want to increment the
>>value and write it back to the file), you should copy them to a
>>generic type.
>
> Why?
Good question. I wanted to say that if you are using a variable you
sometimes cannot decide whether it's better to se a generic or
non-generic type. But the only thing that came to my mind was a counter
(generic) that has to be saved to a binary file (non-generic). Bad
example. Maybe not even worth to talk about. Forget about it.
Jens
- Next message: Ingvar Nilsen: "Re: Delphi 2005 upgrade 2... not recommended"
- Previous message: Iman L Crawford: "Re: Delphi 2005 upgrade 2... not recommended"
- In reply to: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Borland Delphi + 64Bits"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Borland Delphi + 64Bits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]