Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Michael Stum <devnull@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:18:53 +0200
Joanna Carter (TeamB) schrieb:
> "roman modic" <modicr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 42552fcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>>Do you still use Hungarian Notation?
>>According to this article it is obsolete
>>
>
> http://www.richardhaleshawgroup.com/RHSGroup/Community/blogs/programming_in_
> general/archive/2005/03/03/20.aspx
>
> And so it should be! There is no need with modern IDEs to add extraneous and
> cryptic prefixes when you can simply hover your mouse over a variable to see
> what type it really is.
Hmmmm... i may not be an "Enterprise Class Programmer", but i still like
to know what a specific Variable or Function is. I like it whenever i
look at some Code in Wordpad, where there is no Code Insight. I don't
like Variables that consist of 20+ Chars, but I still a little bit of
Information (like sLanguage for a String, iAmount for an Integer or
bRunning for a bool) to my Variables. YMMV.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- References:
- Hungarian Notation
- From: roman modic
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\)
- Hungarian Notation
- Prev by Date: Hungarian Notation
- Next by Date: Re: This may be a crazy idea but...
- Previous by thread: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Next by thread: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
