Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: "Wayne Niddery [TeamB]" <wniddery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 14:37:36 -0400
Jim Cooper wrote:
>
> Then look at the declaration. Hungarian notation is really dumb in OO
> environments where there are hundreds or thousands of types. You need
> a lookup table to find out what the prefix means.
Anything can be taken too far. In my case, using prefixes for components, I
do not devise a prefix for every variation of a basic control. For example,
TEdit, TDBEdit, TMaskEdit, TMemo are all "edXXX". Buttons are "btnXXX"
regardless if TButton, TBitBtn, TSpeedButton, TToolButton, etc.
--
Wayne Niddery - Logic Fundamentals, Inc. (www.logicfundamentals.com)
RADBooks: http://www.logicfundamentals.com/RADBooks.html
In a tornado, even turkeys can fly. - unknown
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- References:
- Hungarian Notation
- From: roman modic
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\)
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Michael Stum
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Jim Cooper
- Hungarian Notation
- Prev by Date: Re: This may be a crazy idea but...
- Next by Date: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Previous by thread: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Next by thread: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Index(es):
Loading