Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: "Dave Moore" <silverstar69NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:29:10 +0100
"Jim Cooper" <jcooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42555c9e$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> But one does not always look at code within the bounds of an IDE. ;-)
>
> All the more reason to use clear unambiguous names (ie *not* Hungarian
> notation) since if it is hard to look up qzFurbleGloop you are going to
> struggle even more to understand the code.
Which is why 2 letters isn't enough for a prefix. 3 or 4 is preferable, then
q(ui)zFurbleGloop becomes something much more understandable
>
> If we follow normal Delphi coding conventions, we all use some HN (eg F
> for fields and T for class), but we should try to keep that sort of thing
> to a minimum.
I kinda disagree. I find Hungarian Notation very readable. But then I have
done a lot of C ;-)
Best,
Dave
>
> Cheers,
> Jim Cooper
>
> __________________________________________
>
> Jim Cooper jcooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Tabdee Ltd http://www.tabdee.ltd.uk
>
> TurboSync - Connecting Delphi to your Palm
> __________________________________________
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- References:
- Hungarian Notation
- From: roman modic
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\)
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: Hungarian Notation
- From: Jim Cooper
- Hungarian Notation
- Prev by Date: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Next by Date: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Previous by thread: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Next by thread: Re: Hungarian Notation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading