Re: Updated QC reports for Delphi 2005 Update 2

Lauchlan M wrote:

> Don't get me wrong, thanks for your efforts, but it really sounds
> very much in the 'too little too late' category . . .

You appear to me to be saying "Unless it's reported in QC as fixed,
then it isn't really fixed".

In other words, while I agree that it would be nice to have the
information right away, better late than never is okay with me.

--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Roadmaps Not Always a Good Idea??
    ... Lauchlan M wrote: ... that's pretty much what I was saying in the broken record ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: where will the action be ?
    ... Lauchlan M wrote: ... > developers who buy VS.NET to use it to develop unmanaged code. ... Nick Hodges -- TeamB ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Addicted to Delphi 2005.
    ... What's your basis for saying this? ... Thx ... Lauchlan M ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Informal Poll --- 100K to 1M Sale
    ... but you aren't saying anything that I can follow. ... Nick Hodges -- TeamB ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Roadmaps Not Always a Good Idea??
    ... Lauchlan M wrote: ... Nick Hodges -- TeamB ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)