Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <velthuis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:16:25 +0200
Hannes Danzl[NDD] wrote:
> > Like Danny Thorpe said, don't underestimate the effort of
> > identifying, fixing and testing critical spots, i.e. where sizes
> > are important, but are simply assumed as fixed, or where pointer
> > and integer sizes are assumed to be the same, or are cast to each
> > other, etc.
>
> Especially in times of .NET i think even a native compiler should
> embrace the concept of
>
> * translating the source lang into a meta language
> * compiling the meta language into intermediate code
> * generate the final byte code for the destination platform
I don't think a native compiler should do that. Let .NET do that.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de
"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who
cannot read them."
-- Mark Twain (1835-1910)
.
- References:
- Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: Akif Oz
- Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: David Farrell-Garcia
- Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: Franz-Leo Chomse
- Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: DS
- Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: David Farrell-Garcia
- Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- From: Hannes Danzl[NDD]
- Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- Prev by Date: Re: Win 64 reality so far
- Next by Date: Re: Win 64 reality so far
- Previous by thread: Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- Next by thread: Re: Wanted: 64bit Delphi
- Index(es):