Re: Delphi 2005



Craig Stuntz [TeamB] wrote:

> No, you were criticized for calling Jake's comments "paid lies" (and
> that was the entirety of your post) when you had no facts to back up
> your slander. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Borland; you said
> something about another individual which isn't true. Don't try to
> dodge responsibility for your personal attack.

I cant see any personal attack there. Hes talking all the time about
bussiness is the queen, and any action have sense in order to win. Im
just folowing jacobson logical.

German.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dan and other liberal "intellectual" morons
    ... Personal attack snipped. ... Let's face the cold hard facts - you can't even come close to ... Well, that was convincing. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Dan and other liberal "intellectual" morons
    ... Personal attack snipped. ... Let's face the cold hard facts - you can't even come close to ... And you know I despise fucking liberals. ... Those liberal things DESERVE contempt. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Dan and other liberal "intellectual" morons
    ... Personal attack snipped. ... Let's face the cold hard facts - you can't even come close to ... Well, that was convincing. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Macs only selling point
    ... Vaporizing fast. ... When faced with obvious facts unfriendly to the Maccie position the ... Maccie inevitably turns to a personal attack directed at the person ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: NSA,Windows, etc.
    ... > personal attack. ... Facts and opinions are two different things. ... The call for "facts" is a spurious tactic in debate. ...
    (sci.crypt)