Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: "Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_stuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [a.k.a. acm.org]>
- Date: 3 May 2005 10:00:14 -0700
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
> So what is the advantage of using native code?
One thing which comes to mind is it will make porting apps much
simpler, as you can do it in stages.
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
IB 6 versions prior to 6.0.1.6 are pre-release and may corrupt
your DBs! Open Edition users, get 6.0.1.6 from http://mers.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- References:
- Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Brion L. Webster
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Marc Scheuner
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Kostya
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Kostya
- Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- Prev by Date: Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- Next by Date: Re: Win 64 reality so far
- Previous by thread: Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- Next by thread: Re: Further evidence MS hasn't abandoned Win32 development
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|