Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: "William Meyer" <wmeyerNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 May 2005 11:06:37 -0700
On 05/02/05, Eric Grange said:
> Native of course, .Net doesn't count as 64bit support,
> just as Java wouldn't count as 64bit support, as the inefficiencies
> of either negates the benefits of 64bit migration.
I think we will see the "native" path become .NET, as it is clear to me
that MS has identified poorly developed apps as damaging to their
business, and in shaping the .NET environment, is taking steps to try
to eliminate the most egregious of the blunders that are commonly found
in app software. As time goes on, I believe they will move to close off
access to unmanaged functions, in an effort to defend against the
hordes of folks whose skills are not equal to the task of developing
highly reliable software.
--
Bill
--------
" They (American universities) do indeed cultivate diversity in race,
skin color, ethnicity, sexual preference. In everything but thought."
-- George Will
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: Kostya
- Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: Martin Waldenburg
- Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- References:
- Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: Dennis Landi
- Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: Lauchlan M
- Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- From: Eric Grange
- Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Michael Slinn's Blog Now Completely Empty?
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- Next by thread: Re: Bill Gates says 64-bit systems mainstream by 2006
- Index(es):