Re: where will the action be ?

Eric Grange wrote:

> This was a rethorical question, we both know the pot is empty.

You cannot speak for me. Well, you can try, but you'd be wrong.

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: where will the action be ?
    ... >>> This was a rethorical question, we both know the pot is empty. ... > Please try debating the issue instead of resorting to trite insults. ... Since when is it an insult to tell someone that they can't speak for me? ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: where will the action be ?
    ... > This was a rethorical question, we both know the pot is empty. ... Some of us think your argument is empty. ... Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.731 ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Poker Ethics Question
    ... to ensure tht the pot is awarded to the best hand. ... who must ensure that the pot is awarded to the best player. ... the principle of "cards speak" includes a responsibility of all ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: The Dry Pot Bluff
    ... from elimination when a King hit the turn. ... I said to him "You just bet into an empty side pot ... have seen wannabe team play at Foxwoods, ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: ecr72
    ... bluffs into an empty side pot, since next time it could be me being all in. ... in a cash game i would rather have the all in player win the pot ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)