Re: where will the action be ?

In article <4297351c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nickhodges@xxxxxxxxx
says...
> I'm not following you here -- I believe JBuilder was around before the
> J++ thing.
>
>
>

This is exactly my point, if Borland waited to follow Microsoft's lead
and play catch up as it is now, Borland would probably be history
already.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Proposal: Delphi VCL+RTL as open source
    ... Borland was always known for it's quickness to respond ... > with Java and waited for Microsoft's JVM before getting into the java ... JBuilder at no time was the savior of Borland. ... Delphi at one time was. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Is it time for a Delphi algorithms group?
    ... Just per chance, you wouldn't happen to have a thousand ... Apparently JBuilder started withering in 2001-2002, ... The CPPB trend indicates that by not issuing new releases, Borland ... Total matches the years' totals, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Looking for Academic version of Delphi?
    ... >>Borland does give away some of it's products, for example, JBuilder ... > NetBeans, and while they're both decent, neither is up to the Borland ... Note that CBuilderX Mobile is available for download if you fill in a ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: And now my thoughts on Delphis survival
    ... Kylix implies nothing about JBuilder. ... Borland has been talking about ... I haven't seen any announcements of upcoming demos of new Kylix ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: article: "Borland going after services revenue"
    ... or other defectures from the JBuilder and ... What I was able to read in Borland press releases and management interviews ... JBuilder loosing market share against Eclipse rapidly ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)