Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Michael Anonymous <Michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:47:28 -0600
Captain Jake wrote:
Eric Grange <egrangeNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message <4296d42f$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This was a rethorical question, we both know the pot is empty.
Some of us think your argument is empty.
Some of us think you don't know how to debate an issue. Instead of discussing the issue, you result to attacking the prose of the argument.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: where will the action be ?
- References:
- where will the action be ?
- From: Mat Ballard
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dennis Landi
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Mat Ballard
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Lauchlan M
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Captain Jake
- where will the action be ?
- Prev by Date: Re: where will the action be ?
- Next by Date: Wasn't dotNet supposed to be a multi-platform alternative to Java?
- Previous by thread: Re: where will the action be ?
- Next by thread: Re: where will the action be ?
- Index(es):