Re: where will the action be ?
- From: "Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 May 2005 21:13:09 -0700
Michael Anonymous wrote:
> > Some of us think your argument is empty.
>
> Some of us think you don't know how to debate an issue.
> Instead of discussing the issue,
> you result to attacking the prose of the argument.
So instead of discussing the issue, you're commenting on his so called
"attacks". How ironic.
--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Michael Anonymous
- Re: where will the action be ?
- References:
- where will the action be ?
- From: Mat Ballard
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dennis Landi
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Mat Ballard
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Lauchlan M
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Michael Anonymous
- where will the action be ?
- Prev by Date: Re: where will the action be ?
- Next by Date: Re: Just random fixes with QC reports...
- Previous by thread: Re: where will the action be ?
- Next by thread: Re: where will the action be ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|