Re: where will the action be ?
- From: "Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 May 2005 21:10:54 -0700
Michael Anonymous wrote:
> > > This was a rethorical question, we both know the pot is empty.
> >
> >
> > You cannot speak for me. Well, you can try, but you'd be wrong.
> >
>
> Please try debating the issue instead of resorting to trite insults.
Since when is it an insult to tell someone that they can't speak for me?
> You lost me, and probably a few other readers,
> when you attacked Eric first.
Since I never attacked Eric, you're wrong again.
--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Michael Anonymous
- Re: where will the action be ?
- References:
- where will the action be ?
- From: Mat Ballard
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dennis Landi
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Mat Ballard
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Lauchlan M
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: where will the action be ?
- From: Michael Anonymous
- where will the action be ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Just random fixes with QC reports...
- Next by Date: Re: where will the action be ?
- Previous by thread: Re: where will the action be ?
- Next by thread: Re: where will the action be ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|