Re: Delphi compared to Visual Age C++

Alessandro Federici wrote:

> "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <velthuis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:xn0e2w09bsbqd002-velthuis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [..]
> > I know a few people from mainframe days who would not talk so
> > favourably about them.
>
> I know others from notebook times who wouldn't either :)

As far as hardware is concerned, IBM is top notch. Their notebooks have
always rated very high in customer satisfaction. Their development
tools is another matter and have always been complex to use, and only
people roped into IBM products continue to use many of them. Key point
is VisualAge is all but dead.

--
David Farrell-Garcia
Whidbey Island Software LLC

Posted with XanaNews 1.17.4.1
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Delphi compared to Visual Age C++
    ... > I know a few people from mainframe days who would not talk so favourably ... I know others from notebook times who wouldn't either:) ... RemObjects Software, Inc. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Delphi compared to Visual Age C++
    ... >>>I know a few people from mainframe days who would not talk so ... >>I know others from notebook times who wouldn't either:) ... I happen to be using IBM Thinkpad (Thinkpad 600 and a ... despite the battery being totally gone. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)