Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: "Wayne Niddery [TeamB]" <wniddery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:04:33 -0400
Msangali wrote:
>
> Totally agree. I was just pointing out that closed source projects
> also fail, amazing examples are everywhere, and many of them burned
> dozens of millions of dollars in the proccess. High rates of failure
> are a problem of the software industry, regardless of the business
> model adopted.
Agreed. The question is whether there is any quantifiable difference between
commercial and OSS in this regard. My *sense* of it is no, in fact I would
expect far more OSS to fail precisely because there is a lot of it that can
do so without serious consequence - nobody has invested their money or
future in a given project and the participants can simply decide to walk
away and do something else.
Where there is actually something riding on the outcome, it is probably a
lot closer, but I'd be curious to see substantiated measurements.
--
Wayne Niddery - Logic Fundamentals, Inc. (www.logicfundamentals.com)
RADBooks: http://www.logicfundamentals.com/RADBooks.html
Bandwagons are like streetcars, there'll be another along in a few
minutes.
.
- References:
- Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Eyal
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: somebody
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Msangali
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Msangali
- Open Source vs. Commercial
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- Next by Date: Re: First day with production development on D2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- Next by thread: Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|