Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: "Nick Hodges [TeamB]" <nickhodges@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jun 2005 15:09:11 -0700
Wayne Niddery [TeamB] wrote:
> That they
> choose not to be paid in monetary form is irrelevant to whether their
> work has value to others. Another measure of progress is in the
> lowering of costs of production - this is considered a good thing in
> all normal cases, but yet you claim a cost of $0 for some component
> of production magically becomes bad and makes things more inefficient
> - that is a contradiction that cannot stand in reality.
Exactly -- as if charging $0.01 cents for 1000 copies of Linux would
suddenly change things.
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick
.
- References:
- Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Eyal
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Eyal
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Eyal
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- From: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
- Open Source vs. Commercial
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- Next by Date: Re: The perfect formula for users to help D10(D2006?) succeed
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- Next by thread: Re: Open Source vs. Commercial
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|