Re: Cooling off period needed?

"Brian Moelk" <bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:42a46f7e$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

>
> "Everyone" is quite a generalization and I suspect that those that you
> perceive to have a chip on their shoulder will not see themselves as
> having one. But without calling them out specifically, we won't know;
> I am not suggesting that you do that.
>

You are right about that, "Everyone" is an over generalization. I
apologize to anyone offended. It just seems to me that many mild
statements, which are not decorated with the required humbleisms (IMO,
IMHO, ISTM, etc.) are jumped on immediately just for the sake of venting
against the poster rather than to facilitate constructive discussion. But
perhaps some participants would rather fight than advance. To each his
own.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cooling off period needed?
    ... "Everyone" is quite a generalization and I suspect that those that you ... perceive to have a chip on their shoulder will not see themselves as having ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Ten Commandments (On Topic!)
    ... >Perhaps the generalization of "doing numerical analysis by ... >generalization is inaccurate" is a better one? ... I suspect that the 32-64-128 bit survey results Dan gave reflected ... algebra to give you expressions that focus on the digits that matter. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Logic of kin selection
    ... >>I suspect this needed generalization is actually out there somewhere in ... However, I suspect ... I wonder if it's in Trivers' reciprocal altruism paper? ... Bob O'Hara ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: OT: BUSTED!
    ... I suspect you can't back that generalization up with any facts. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: TR Black Hill from Crowden
    ... Sounds like someone has got a chip on his shoulder here ... for some reason. ... I suspect that some missed the irony in some of his writing, ...
    (uk.rec.walking)