Re: Source Control




"Craig Stuntz [TeamB]" <craig_stuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [a.k.a. acm.org]> wrote in message news:42c452f5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I don't agree, largely because of how productive it has been for me to
> review not only my own changes but those of other developers in my
> organization:

> http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/archive/2005/06/15/StarTeamCodeReview
> .aspx

Do you review source code before every check in?


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP and Pair Programming
    ... >>>Although pairs of developers tend to cost more than single developers ... > The previous responder was saying that adding a person for a review process, ... > then I would state that pair programming simply takes times ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document
    ... to the kernel development process. ... I suspect the "2000 active developers" is a bit hypey. ... THE IMPORTANCE OF GETTING CODE INTO THE MAINLINE ... +- Kernel code is subjected to review, both before and after merging into ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: the " official point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    ... If there are factual errors or things you consider offensive in the FAQ, ... follows the Linux way in all respects. ... A very important part of a review is whether it follows the ... The Linux kernel sometimes looses developers. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: OT: Paging the code-monkeys and managers thereof.
    ... "Peer review of code" is a phrase tossed about by the clueless. ... Therefore the developers who make a point of keeping up with the ... changes in new releases develop more efficient code, ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: OT: Paging the code-monkeys and managers thereof.
    ... "Peer review of code" is a phrase tossed about by the clueless. ... Therefore the developers who make a point of keeping up with the ... Everything you've said is totally unconnected to any business case. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)