Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: "Ralf Mimoun" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:58:07 +0200
OBones wrote:
....
> That is valid when you are developping from sratch. But when you are
> overtaking a program with a 10 year history of not caring about memory
> leaks, I find it very good to simply have a report at the end with all
> the leaks in details just like MemCheck does.
Right. But it does not hurt to run FastMM with all bells&whistles, to catch
the more serious bugs like buffer overflow etc. It does not matter if a
project is new or a decade old, such bugs should be smashed rigorously. And
after some months of using MemCheck and healing one leak after another, it
could be a good idea to give the FastMM reporting feature a new try.
Ralf
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: OBones
- Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- References:
- FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: Max
- Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: Oliver Townshend
- Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: Max
- Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: Ralf Mimoun
- Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- From: OBones
- FastMM <-> MemCheck
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are my XP forms white?
- Next by Date: Re: Why are my XP forms white?
- Previous by thread: Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- Next by thread: Re: FastMM <-> MemCheck
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|