Re: Serious .NET Problem?

Kevin wrote:

> They wouldn't be forcing third parties to upgrade to the latest dev
> tool. Do you think I'm wrong on that point?

So they should do all the work of providing new features (ie support
for the new API) for no cost to the user? I know if I worked that way,
I'd soon be out of business, or very hungry, or both.

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Longhorn to be 64Bit only, no 32Bit
    ... The current dev is being done from one code base for i386and x64 so as ... long as things go to the current plan we should sim ship ... >>> Upgrade versions will slow down or might not even sell - Which is why ... >> Mike Brannigan ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Wireless revisited
    ... so I can't upgrade it to Linux since I don't ... > rid of the interference with Microwaves etc. Otoh, ... Kevin & Theresa Miller ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: AIX datacenter politics
    ... we usually allocate a window where I can upgrade ... ML (maintenance level) application strategy for our Development pSeries ... MLs shall only be applied to Dev servers ... I am going to attempt writing business case document on the issue... ...
    (AIX-L)
  • Re: upgrading mainboard
    ... "Kevin" wrote: ... > a retail version. ... If you are running an OEM copy you may be out of luck. ... >> I would like to upgrade my computers mainboard, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Error installing libgimp2.0 on Debian unstable - SOLVED
    ... On, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: ... >> When trying to upgrade my system today, ... >> Rename this and do it again. ...
    (Debian-User)