Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- From: Brian Moelk <bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jul 2005 05:52:03 -0700
Number of people here saying Delphi was a "rock solid" release: 0
Nick, I'm not sure what your point is here, but I think you know what I meant. Just as I know you mean Delphi 2005 and not some other release.
There are certainly some people that find it "stable enough" or "usable" and some that do not, as they both continue to testify on these NGs. But my point is that Borland themselves recognize the release was not "stable enough" for *enough* of their customers as evidenced by their recent PR campaigns. I conclude that this means it has hurt them in some meaningful way; perhaps it's merely hurt the pride of the development team, but I think it's been in revenue as well. And while I do appreciate the PR and extra communication, until they release DeXter, no one knows how *effective* these changes will be.
-- Brian Moelk bmoelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.brainendeavor.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- References:
- Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- Prev by Date: Re: OMG. I am glad I never had to dealt with it
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- Previous by thread: Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- Next by thread: Re: Delphi 2005 Update 4
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
