Re: Is there a future for Borland in .NET?

Brian,

<< I think they made a mistake by spending too much time on VCL.NET so they
could migrate their existing customer's code to .NET. I agree with the
assesment that migration is less important than interop. I would have
preferred a more targetted/pure and less backward compatible implementation
of the Delphi language for dotNET. >>

I absolutely agree. This is in fact how RemObjects did an IMO much better
implantation of Pascal in .NET.

Ole Willy Tuv


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gillet on buying.
    ... imo it's a load of bollocks. ... I kinda wished it wasn't as any report will vindicate Rafa and perhap's increase the wedge he has to spend. ... massive spending. ... It seems to me that the only way to make money is via the share prices as opposed to prize money, ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)
  • Re: SQUID AND THE WHALE (no spoilers)
    ... fact that I received THE SQUID AND THE WHALE on "opening day" tells me there's not much clamor for it. ... Big mistake, imo. ...
    (rec.arts.movies.current-films)
  • Re: Myers Out, Scranton RHP In....
    ... Igawa may be another example of the same kind of mistake they made ... It would be hypocritical as a Yankee fan to accuse the Red ... Sox of frivolous spending. ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.ny-yankees)
  • Re: Stop Calling Delphi
    ... > IMO it is not! ... Ideas based on non-essentials and which mistake a simple correllation for ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: rFactor, is it just another F1C, GTR clone?
    ... Much better IMO. ... But after spending four hours or so ... thrashing around in the "starter" vehicles I'm not ...
    (rec.autos.simulators)