Re: You think you have it bad
- From: "David Koretzky" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:15:37 -0400
John,
I am sorry to say much like the promise of releasing the C++ survey results,
you are incorrect again.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/borland.public.delphi.non-technical/browse_frm/thread/8aab829b0ead6414/69d90f945bd62981?lnk=st&q=borland+delphi+non+technical+%22wanna+have+some+fun%22&rnum=1&hl=en#69d90f945bd62981
While you did not initiate the thread (your friend did), you did post to it,
and it generated a lot of noise (which is to be expected) in both places.
He should have posted an EMACS vs VI thread instead.
DK
"John Kaster (Borland)" <johnk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42e6aca9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Angra Mainyu wrote:
>
> > both
> > Anders Ohlsson and John Kaster were encouraging folks to visit the VB
>
> Incorrect. Please back up your recollection with actual quotes
> immediately or withdraw them. TIA.
>
> --
> John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk
> Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com
> Get source: http://cc.borland.com
> If it's not here, it's not happening: http://ec.borland.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: You think you have it bad
- From: John Kaster (Borland)
- Re: You think you have it bad
- References:
- You think you have it bad
- From: William Bates
- Re: You think you have it bad
- From: Martin Waldenburg
- Re: You think you have it bad
- From: Mike Vance
- Re: You think you have it bad
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: You think you have it bad
- From: Angra Mainyu
- Re: You think you have it bad
- From: John Kaster (Borland)
- You think you have it bad
- Prev by Date: Re: Guidelines please
- Next by Date: Re: Guidelines please
- Previous by thread: Re: You think you have it bad
- Next by thread: Re: You think you have it bad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
