Re: You think you have it bad

As someone pointed out earlier, Angra's post was half true. I was posting
to the rabid objection that netiher you nor Anders posted here encouraging
people to head over to a VB newsgroup and talk about how great Delphi was.
While it was not you and Anders, Anders did do it. Angra should have used
OR in his if statement instead of AND. I think we can also wrap your
constant high strung nature in a while loop while we are at it <g>.

Anyway, I don't want to get in one of those groovy syntax wars with you and
the TeamB folks, where you dissect sentences in Clintonesque fashion, such
as the whole C++Builder open letter and what the meaning of the word
"promise" is, etc.

I frankly don't post enough to care. I just stuck my nose in knowing that
you would snap back. I do get a kick out of how riled up you get though
<g>.


"John Kaster (Borland)" <johnk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42e70ad2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> David Koretzky wrote:
>
> > While you did not initiate the thread
>
> Precisely.
>
> Here are my TWO posts on the subject on THIS newsgroup:
>
> >>
> 1) message 18
> "Wayne Herbert" wrote:
> > You might want to save this quote and review it a bit farther on down
> the
> > road. XML holds much promise.
>
>
> As a programming language?
>
> 2) Message 51
>
>
> "Jeff Overcash (TeamB)" wrote:
> > Strange, for me stupid is more an insult than ignorant.
>
>
> As it should be. Stupidity is permanent (unless some amazing medical
> advances occur). Ignorance is temporary and easily solved.
>
> <<
>
> There a NO posts by me in the vb.general.discussion group.
>
> So ... you want to run that by me once more?
>
> --
> John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk
> Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com
> Get source: http://cc.borland.com
> If it's not here, it's not happening: http://ec.borland.com


.

Relevant Pages