Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005

Dave Nottage [TeamB] wrote: 
I would definitely call it a false assumption if Dave has knowledge
that counters the original assumption- which he obviously does have.


Another false assumption <g>

I'm not saying he is wrong or right, just that *he* doesn't have the
information to be able to reach that conclusion with any certainty ie
that supposedly "all resources will be committed to Delphi 2006".

Wow, now I'm actually on Michael's side- it is a "reasonable assumption" then. :-D
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Delphi 2006 broken
    ... Dave Nottage [TeamB] wrote: ... when there's a deliberate error there? ... Setting the DriverIndex didn't fire any of the events for me, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Delphi 9 - Your Expectations
    ... Dave Nottage [TeamB] in wrote: ... something out when/if I go to China and India in November. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly
    ... Dave Nottage [TeamB] wrote: ... > there no API for it, is it not officially supported, or is it likely to ... that even tool makers are told to substitute their compilers. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Why arent you upgrading?
    ... Dave Nottage [TeamB] wrote: ... So improving it so it isn't is not an option? ... "Programming is an art form that fights back" ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: What is the status of Delphi?
    ... "Dave Nottage [TeamB] ... the messy segment oriented addressing mode in Win16 which was a big ... I believe win32 will stay with us longer than we expect. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)