Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005

From: Kevin Berry <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:38:59 -0500

Dejan Stanic wrote:

2.0 to something in the league of Visual Studio 2005 or DeXter? .NET 2.0 support is simply one _FEATURE_.
Even if true, this is a very simplistic POV.

It is no more simplistic than Compact Framework support. Since that is only now being added to Delphi is that a reason to have discredited Delphi 2005 completely when comparing it to Visual Studio .NET 2003? Personally, I don't think so. IMO, .NET 2.0 will represent a small fraction of the overall development for at least 6 months after its release. It's a nice-to-have feature but not essential to most development projects out there.

Cheers,
Kevin.
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Dejan Stanic

References:
- Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Venkatesh VT
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Chris Brooksbank
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Lauchlan M
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Kevin Berry
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Lauchlan M
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Kevin Berry
- Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
  - From: Dejan Stanic

Prev by Date: Re: Object Pascal Stigma, Useless Survey Question
Next by Date: Re: Object Pascal Stigma, Useless Survey Question
Previous by thread: Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
Next by thread: Re: Delphi 2006 in Nov/Dec 2005
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread