Re: Dexter wish

Paul Dolen wrote:
> My understanding is that some of the refactoring is .NET code, and
> Borland has no intention to rewrite it in Win32.

Rewrite? It would be a good "dogfooding" showcase for Borland to demonstrate
the excellent multi-platform migration support in Delphi, demonstrating how
very easy it should be to port legacy code from .NET to native! <gd&rlh>

--
Kristofer


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dexter wish
    ... >> Borland has no intention to rewrite it in Win32. ... It would be a good "dogfooding" showcase for Borland to demonstrate ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Dexter wish
    ... Borland has no intention to rewrite it in Win32. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Is Borland Compiler Suited for my Needs (Better than VC++)?
    ... Borland, in my opinion, are a poor excuse for a ... If they offer you a cheap version with licence ... > an exception for Borland, and do the decent thing by them. ... .NET code over a similar set of components. ...
    (comp.programming)
  • Re: Win32, Linux, .NET >> Where is this mess going to?
    ... I hear a lot of people say they are switching to Vs.net and I wonder how ... They either write small application they can easily rewrite in C# in a few ... I started programming with turbo Pascal 3 and I heard ... Thank you Borland and all you component ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)