Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: "Bob Dawson" <bdawson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:04:08 -0500
"Jarle Stabell" wrote
>
> (This proof-technique, starting with the opposite assumption
> and trying to end up with something known to be false, is
> called reductio ad absurdum)
And doesn't work in areas like infinity. For example, if we can conceive of
infinity + 1, then does that prove that infinity isn't infinite? Challenging
someone to find a workable value for the delta is simply inviting them into
a mathematical trap, like challenging them to find a workable value for
infinity itself as a way of proving that infinity can't exist.
bobD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Jarle Stabell
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- References:
- Idle Thoughts
- From: John Wester [Group W]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: paladin
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Jarle Stabell
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Dejan Stanic
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Lord Crc
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Lord Crc
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: J. Lee
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: J. Lee
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Jarle Stabell
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Nick Hodges [TeamB]
- Re: Idle Thoughts
- From: Jarle Stabell
- Idle Thoughts
- Prev by Date: Re: Story of our Lives
- Next by Date: Re: Nick ad Rudy finally exposed
- Previous by thread: Re: Idle Thoughts
- Next by thread: Re: Idle Thoughts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|