Re: .NET
- From: "Dave Nottage [TeamB]" <davidn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2005 06:07:27 -0700
"Henrick Hellström [StreamSec]" wrote:
> > > Can you give me one example of why someone would develop a .NET
> > > application which will be run on a desktop system not connected
> > > to a network?
> >
> > One? There's loads: word processing, image editing, financial
> > applications, games etc etc. A lot of the stuff you do in Win32
> > where connection to a network isn't mandatory.
>
> Isn't most of that applications people tend to give as examples when
> arguing that there are things you do better in native Win32 than in
> .NET?
Just because they might be better in native Win32 doesn't stop people
from writing them for .NET.
--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.
- References:
- .NET
- From: Fedaykin
- Re: .NET
- From: Abraham
- Re: .NET
- From: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\)
- Re: .NET
- From: Adam Roslon
- Re: .NET
- From: Robert Giesecke
- Re: .NET
- From: Adam Roslon
- Re: .NET
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: .NET
- From: Adam Roslon
- Re: .NET
- From: Dave Nottage [TeamB]
- Re: .NET
- From: "Henrick Hellström [StreamSec]"
- .NET
- Prev by Date: Re: Kylix is dead?
- Next by Date: Re: .NET
- Previous by thread: Re: .NET
- Next by thread: Re: .NET
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|