Re: .NET
At 04:22:05, 29.08.2005, JED wrote:
> Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
>
> > WinForms is, sometimes. I doubt Avalon will be, and programs written
> > with the VCL.NET are not sluggish at all, IME.
>
> Have you seen the video card requirements for avalon?
> Depends what code is behind the application as to how sluggish they
> appear as well.
Yes, of course, the code is always important.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
http://velthuis.homepage.t-online.de
"When I am dead, I hope it may be said: 'His sins were scarlet but his
books were read." -- Hillaire Belloc.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: .NET
... > WinForms is, sometimes. ... > with the VCL.NET are not sluggish at all, IME. ... Have you seen the video card requirements for avalon? ... Depends what code is behind the application as to how sluggish they ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) - Re: A .NET Poll
... Mobile development PDAs etc. ... Yes but sluggish UI. ... Might get beter with Avalon. ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) - Re: Where4s Delphi going?
... Especially if Microsoft ... doesn't just encourage Avalon, but actively discourages Winforms. ... I'll write that demo when VCL for Avalon ships and upgrade it for the ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) - Re: Delphi to C#?
... What a pity the user has to pay the price for it with sluggish performance. ... Delphi is the world's greatest IDE/compiler for Win32 work; there really isn't anything else that I would rather use... ... I'm still waiting for ANYONE to show me an example of a WinForms .net app that I cannot identify as such within moments of starting it up and using it by its notable slowness. ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) - Re: Does VCL have a future?
... > Better to say that XAML will be one way to write Longhorn apps. ... as with WinForms) and has a separate class structure. ... I think MS is saying that Avalon ...
(borland.public.delphi.non-technical) |
|
