Re: Yet Another Arnold Article


"John Kaster (Borland)" <johnk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4314d9af$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Scott Roberts wrote:
>
> > So if it's obvious - and in fact mandatory - why did he mention it?
>
> To state the obvious to those people who don't know it's obvious.

Why didn't he mention that Borland will also continue to pay it's employees?
He could also have mentioned that the sky is blue, just in case someone
wasn't aware.

In fact, when someone says "I'd listen to any offers out there" it generally
means they are interested in selling. It's entirely possible that it wasn't
meant that way in this case, but how likely is it? That's the question.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
    ... John Kaster (Borland) wrote: ... > Scott Roberts wrote: ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: VS 2005 beta 2 for free (or nearly free)
    ... since Borland is selling Togetheraggressively to ... JoeH ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: New idea for prodcut loyalty and increasing overall image
    ... Bandwidth is a quantifiable expense. ... Borland has the man-hours if the return is there. ... Borland has an interest in selling, whether you agree with what they ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Delphi 8 Win32 release date?
    ... I'm glad to hear that D8 is selling well. ... fact that after Borland has the Win32 support in the next Galileo IDE ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Borland ALM Move Explained
    ... I think you meant to ask, "What would be a valid reason for selling ... all that's left is the ALM as far as I know. ... Why is Borland selling off their highest revenue generating products ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)