Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: "IanH" <none@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 07:54:16 -0700
Larry Drews wrote:
> I don't disagree with you at all. My post was prompted by what
> seemed to be the attitude that Borland should have some other reason
> than shareholder value for its decisions and actions.
Unreasonable attitudes? Here? Surely not ;-)
> You and I use
> Borland products only as long as it is profitable to us. Borland
> will produce Delphi only as long as it is the most profitable
> strategy for them. Everything else is hot air.
Exactly. My business requirement is for Delphi to continue to be the
best all-purpose development tool around, to maximise my investment in
my code base. I am starting to think that this is no longer a goal for
Borland - or at least that their definition of best is predicated on
their vision of SDO.
I have had over 10 years' good value from Borland. If our best
interests no longer coincide, then fair enough. Good luck to both of us.
> I know this is probably boringly obvious to you, but then you would
> seem to be in a minority of posters in this newsgroup.
I'll take that as a compliment, if you don't mind :-)
Regards,
Ian
.
- References:
- Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: Angra Mainyu
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: Angra Mainyu
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: IanH
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: Larry Drews
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: IanH
- Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- From: Larry Drews
- Yet Another Arnold Article
- Prev by Date: Re: .NET
- Next by Date: Re: Danny Thorpe on Unicode and VCL
- Previous by thread: Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- Next by thread: Re: Yet Another Arnold Article
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|