Re: Thanks for the *good* news!

Brian Moelk wrote:

> IMO, there is nothing new here. In fact Jennifer clarified that he
> was referring to the developer role in general and not specifically
> any IDE.

Pity she didn't tell you in the same interview Rick talked about
Delphi, and how she cut those parts out, mainly because it wasn't the
focus of the article.

...or did she?

--
Dave Nottage [TeamB]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thanks for the *good* news!
    ... Brian Moelk wrote: ... > IMO, ... > was referring to the developer role in general and not specifically ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Update 3 - The performance update
    ... Brian Moelk wrote: ... > IMO, it's natural to be defensive when critical things are said about ... The thread has lost this context though and has now centered ... there are twenty gods, or no God. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Fundamentalist Hierarchy
    ... Answered Questions_. ... As I suggested before, IMO, He was referring to ... the manner in which the lower conditions (mineral cohesion, ...
    (soc.religion.bahai)
  • Re: BDS 2007 ETA? - Software Assurance gets a no vote here
    ... Brian Moelk wrote: ... trying to make it clear that we /aren't/ Borland? ... IMO, you trimmed his quote too aggressively, the part that is key is: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: OT: Edwards finally comes clean - too late
    ... referring to his Senate record (which isn't really all that great, IMO, if ... I'll take a crapshoot over a sure ride to Hades any ...
    (sci.med.transcription)