Re: Thanks for the *good* news!

Brian Moelk wrote:

> IMO, there is nothing new here. In fact Jennifer clarified that he
> was referring to the developer role in general and not specifically
> any IDE.

If you want to know what Rick said about Delphi, you can email him,
too. I have reason to believe he answers his email.

--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] . Vertex Systems Corp. . Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Please read and follow Borland's rules for the user of their
server: http://support.borland.com/entry.jspa?externalID=293
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thanks for the *good* news!
    ... Brian Moelk wrote: ... > IMO, ... > was referring to the developer role in general and not specifically ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Update 3 - The performance update
    ... Brian Moelk wrote: ... > IMO, it's natural to be defensive when critical things are said about ... The thread has lost this context though and has now centered ... there are twenty gods, or no God. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Fundamentalist Hierarchy
    ... Answered Questions_. ... As I suggested before, IMO, He was referring to ... the manner in which the lower conditions (mineral cohesion, ...
    (soc.religion.bahai)
  • Re: BDS 2007 ETA? - Software Assurance gets a no vote here
    ... Brian Moelk wrote: ... trying to make it clear that we /aren't/ Borland? ... IMO, you trimmed his quote too aggressively, the part that is key is: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: 32 or 64??
    ... you'll learn the craziest things when you google stuff or actually rtfm. ... I'm referring to new users. ... Just IMO. ...
    (Ubuntu)