Re: DeXter IDE startup time

John Kaster (Borland) wrote:

> Will DeWitt Jr. wrote:
>
> > To remove the dependence on .NET, of course.
>
> Please provide some valid reasons we should remove the requirement for
> .NET on a development machine for a development tool the size and
> scope of Delphi.

If the refactoring is written in Delphi there is a good change that you
could just recompile it in Win32. Then the R&D could be skipped and
just do quaility control on it. Couldn't hurt to try.

--
--------------
Joe Bain
www.iegsoftware.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DeXter IDE startup time
    ... Will DeWitt Jr. ... > To remove the dependence on .NET, ... Please provide some valid reasons we should remove the requirement for ... ..NET on a development machine for a development tool the size and scope ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: DeXter IDE startup time
    ... > Please provide some valid reasons we should remove the requirement for ... > .NET on a development machine for a development tool the size and ... Want native support in Delphi for AMD64/EM64T? ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Developing in a VM
    ... I currently have 2 gigs of memory on my development machine (which is a ... Jim Cooper wrote: ... of Delphi on one) without having to reinstall the OS all the time. ... I use one VM only for testing software I've downloaded, so my host ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Downgrading to D7
    ... 512MB RAM is the absolute minimum that I'd ever want to run a ... I have disabled all the Delphi 2007 features that I don't use, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Delphi and Visual Studio.Net
    ... I have a development machine currently installed with Delphi 6 Pro and am ... looking at installing VS.NET and don't want anything to break. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)