Re: Version Control Sofwtare
- From: Charles Pope <charles.publicREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:04:27 +0000
Thomas Mueller wrote:
CVSNT is not bad, and merging works well as it keeps track of when you last merged between branches.If you are free to chose, use Subversion. I don't even consider CVS any more after I tried Subversion. The list of its shortcomings that are (mostly) fixed in Subversion is rather long.
It is still building on CVS of course, but I was happy enough with CVSNT (after CVS) to not switch everyone to Subversion. I also felt it was not different enough to warrant the effort upgrading, and really one of the distributed version control systems like Arch or Darcs might be the way forward in the longer term.
For a sole developer any version control system is worthwhile, and you don't have to worry about team features. I am sure Subversion would be better if starting from scratch.
Charles .
- References:
- Version Control Sofwtare
- From: Eug. C.
- Re: Version Control Sofwtare
- From: danny heijl
- Re: Version Control Sofwtare
- From: Thomas Mueller
- Version Control Sofwtare
- Prev by Date: Re: personal edition
- Next by Date: Re: BDNradio replay: 24 Hours of Borland Developer Studio 2006
- Previous by thread: Re: Version Control Sofwtare
- Next by thread: Re: Version Control Sofwtare
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|