Re: Any reason to install update 1 if you're not using C++?


Ahem (from readme of Update 1):

"
A new dbexpasa30.dll driver is being delivered in this update which will fix a problem with stored procedures returning NULL for some parameter types.

The project manager now supports moving a file outside of its parent directory in order to change the build order. Previously, you could change the build order only by moving files around within a directory, or by moving directories within the project.
For example, if you had 2 files in Dir1 and 2 files in Dir2, the project manager did not support the following build order:
Dir1/file1
Dir2/file1
Dir1/file2
Dir2/file2

The debugger/module view now shows symbol files for modules with .tds files.

The context menu of .rc files in the Project Manager did not contain the Compile Action option. This was because renamed .txt files were not placed in the proper container with the associated functions.
Now the .txt files are placed in the proper container.

Rename Refactoring had known problems when trying to rename components that were managed by the VCL designer. The refactoring could generate errors or fail to rename all references. You can now use Rename Refactoring to rename components that are managed by the VCL designer.

You can now perform Rename Refactoring on a single instance of a char variable.

Previously, compiling an ActiveX library with an Active Form set to "Include About Box" could result in errors. This has been resolved.
"

I think these are quite compelling reasons!
:-)


Alexander Tereshchenko
alex@xxxxxxxx

If I live through this job without completely losing my mind,
it will be a miracle of Biblical proportions.
                            -- Cmdr. Susan Ivanova, Babylon 5


Max wrote:
Steve Summers wrote:
I'm basking in the glow of a Delphi version that finally gives me a reason to upgrade from D5, and the thought of risking its destabilization with an update patch I don't even need scares me just a bit. (I didn't even install the C++ personality- or the C# personality or the Delphi.NET either), so I'd like to give it a few weeks. Any reason not to?


no reason.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Finding installed package files
    ... >>Well I really dislike that the Fedora guys renamed the package. ... the rename is done for a very good reason - changes that make it ... the reason I wanted to replace it was ... the Linux side of my box after using OOo for over a year with XP. ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • RE: Forest confusion/question
    ... You can either rename the domain (assuming this is a Windows Server 2003 ... main reason why you would create a subdomain and not too many people create ... This will make administration of your forest a lot easier and won't impact ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: IRP Create
    ... a bunch of writes, then doing a rename operation, then do other operations. ... IO Manager issues requests to FS driver in response to native API calls ... that are made by the client code, so that IRP_MJ_CREATE is the result ... to be performed when an IRP Create operation is ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: IRP Create
    ... issues the appropriate commands for a specific file operation. ... IO Manager issues requests to FS driver in response to native API calls ... to be performed (eg read, write, rename) when an IRP Create operation is ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: Windows 2008 Domain Name Rename
    ... to 2008 as opposed to beforehand? ... I understand the tool is now included with Windows 2008 but wondered ... Also, I've seen little reason, I mean *real* reason to really rename a domain. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)