Re: What Borland should stop wasting their time on

From: Eric Grange <egrangeNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:46:56 +0100

* Interbase - On Windows, why would anybody want to use Interbase over SQL Server?

I heartily disagree, actually why would anyone use a database with broken transaction support like MSSQL Server is beyond me. Even in its latest incarnation, for which it was supposed to have been fixed, it's still broken: write transactions DO still block read transactions.

Eric
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What Borland should stop wasting their time on
  - From: Arthur Hoornweg

References:
- What Borland should stop wasting their time on
  - From: Larry

Prev by Date: Re: 64 bit data types
Next by Date: Re: BDS2006 installation
Previous by thread: Re: What Borland should stop wasting their time on
Next by thread: Re: What Borland should stop wasting their time on
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: tquery vs tadoquery master/detail deletions
... >not sure if I then have to manually handle starting and committing ... >commit and/or rollback the transactions as needed. ... >MSSQL Server 2000. ... >part because of the lack of good detailed examples on ADO dataset usage. ...
(borland.public.delphi.database.ado)
MSSQL ODBC And Transactions
... I have developed the ODBC app which can work with Oracle as well as ... MSSQL server databases. ... I need to use transactions at some level. ... COMMIT WORK everything works fine with Oracle. ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.connect)
MSSQL ODBC And Transactions
... I have developed the ODBC app which can work with Oracle as well as ... MSSQL server databases. ... I need to use transactions at some level. ... COMMIT WORK everything works fine with Oracle. ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.odbc)