Re: 64 bit data types
- From: "John Herbster" <herb-sci1_at_sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:52:27 -0600
"Florent Ouchet" <ouchet.florent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> What we need now is fixed size data types (Byte, Word, DWord, QWord,
> UInt64, ShortInt, SmallInt, LongInt, Int64) ...
Thanks for starting this thread. For any new names, I hope
that we can invent names that are self-descriptive.
All that I can guess about the old ShortInt is that it is
smaller than the LongInt, and the SmallInt is larger than
the TinyInt and smaller than the BigInt. I have no idea
if ShortInt is larger or smaller than SmallInt nor if
LongInt is larger or smaller than BigInt, unless I look
them up.
In my code, I usually try to document the size of these
more nebulous things with comments.
Further, in the past, I have worked with machines
where the "words" were 12 (CDC peripheral processors),
16, 32 (IBM), 48 (DataCraft), and 60-bits (CDC-6400),
so I do not consider "word" very descriptive. I would
not be surprised if the next "native" size on the PC
after 64-bits was 96 rather than the power-of-two-
progression value 128.
Rgds, JohnH
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: Florent Ouchet
- Re: 64 bit data types
- References:
- 64 bit data types
- From: Florent Ouchet
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: Ender
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: Florent Ouchet
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: Ender
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: Florent Ouchet
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: John Herbster
- Re: 64 bit data types
- From: Florent Ouchet
- 64 bit data types
- Prev by Date: Re: Runtime design forms support
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi 200x Linux ???
- Previous by thread: Re: 64 bit data types
- Next by thread: Re: 64 bit data types
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|