Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: "Captain Jake" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:42:53 -0600
"Christopher Burke" <borlandng@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43ea7f44$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Captain Jake wrote:
"Christopher Burke" <borlandng@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageJust fine ... thanks to people reverse engineering, not to anything Apple
news:43ea78c9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Quicktime is a closed format.
But it runs on non-Apple hardware just fine.
did.
I use Quicktime on a Win32 machine. It was downloaded from the Apple
website. Are you saying that Apple reverse engineered their own software in
order to provide a Win32 version? And that somehow this makes it "closed"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: tony
- Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: Christopher Burke
- Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: Christopher Burke
- Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: Captain Jake
- Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- From: Christopher Burke
- Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- Prev by Date: Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- Next by Date: Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- Next by thread: Re: Apple as the buyer is not that far fetched...read more
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|