Re: de facto documentation tool
- From: "Jarle Stabell" <jarle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:12:30 +0100
Brian Moelk wrote:
It would be nice, if anyone could share any thoughts. Also, do you
use javadoc style or XML style or any other de facto style? TIA
Some options:
http://www.zeitungsjunge.de/delphi/pasdoc/
http://pasdoc.sipsolutions.net/PasDoc
http://www.time2help.com
http://www.doc-o-matic.com
I don't like mixing documentation comments with code comments, but
that seems to be the standard way of doing things. I personally
would like to have external stub files that can be regenerated and
localized;
Time2HELP has a concept of UnitDoc files, which are separate xml files which
it can synchronize against the structure of the units they document.
This way, it is possible to have UnitDocs in different languages for the
same source code and build multiple help files (you have to create one T2H
project for each help file (language) you want)
I believe Doc-O-Matic also has a concept of storing documentation in
external files, but I don't know the details.
and then IDE integration of these external files.
I've never seen such a beast.
Do you mean an editor which displays for each source code "item", all the
"variants" (translations) of the documentation for it?
(I've never seen that feature in this specific kind of application)
Cheers,
Jarle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: de facto documentation tool
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: de facto documentation tool
- References:
- de facto documentation tool
- From: R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
- Re: de facto documentation tool
- From: Brian Moelk
- de facto documentation tool
- Prev by Date: Re: .net technology
- Next by Date: Re: This is not what I expected (MS to buy Delphi)
- Previous by thread: Re: de facto documentation tool
- Next by thread: Re: de facto documentation tool
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|