Re: ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- From: rich <no@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:56:58 -0500
Henry wrote:
We are all familiar with the larval stage of a RAD programmer; all the application's code is in event handlers, and each form is an independent application. Enlightenment usually dawns when the programmer needs to coordinate two forms, as a consequence of them being parts of the same application, and some meta-form code must be written.
Now write an ASP.NET application. What do you get? Unless you make strenuous efforts, battling the framework and IDE all the way, each page is a separate application, with very limited opportunity for passing state between pages. (The component model and page life-cycle also become your bitter enemies at this point.) There is no high-level view, unless you write your own MVC, in which case you're a lot better off with Ruby on Rails.
Yea, the whole web browser application philosophy is crap.
People just seem to fall for any new horse*** that comes along.
Thinking on a higher level and not getting caught up in the newest fad will get you where you need to be.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- From: Brian Moelk
- Re: ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- References:
- ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- From: Henry
- ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- Prev by Date: Re: how do you name the controls?
- Next by Date: Re: how do you name the controls?
- Previous by thread: Re: ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- Next by thread: Re: ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- Index(es):