Re: Open Delphi?
- From: "Robby Tanner" <robby_tanner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:08:15 -0600
"Marco van de Voort" <marcov@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrne1o5d3.17sn.marcov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
for example. I can think of few developers I've met that I'd want
maintaining
Delphi, to be honest.
That means you don't hang out enough on #fpc maillists and irc's :-)
Of course the definition of maintaining may vary.
I think with such a project you will get an enormous conflict between
users
and devels that merely want to merely keep apps running, and ones that
move forward
(new features, new OSes, .NET versions etc)
The problem here is that the first are the biggest group, but magnitudes
less likely to contribute anything, while for the second, it is the other
way around.
Three words Gee, See Sea.
Rob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Re: Open Delphi?
- References:
- Open Delphi?
- From: Danijel Tkalcec
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Alan Garny
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Alan Garny
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Alan Garny
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Alex Zencovich
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Robby Tanner
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Jim Cooper
- Re: Open Delphi?
- From: Marco van de Voort
- Open Delphi?
- Prev by Date: Re: Development laptop?
- Next by Date: Re: ASP.NET: Fundementally Flawed Architecture
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Delphi?
- Next by thread: Re: Open Delphi?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|