Re: What this mean for Borland?
- From: Sarah <SarahBram@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:19:53 -0600
marc hoffman wrote:
As a matter of fact Borland did the opposite mistake with Delphi for .NET imho - Delphi needed to change for .NET, and they failed to do so
I am glad that Borland maintained the backward compatibility
without losing the ability to develop native applications.
I am equally glad that you people have developed Chrome with a brand new start, for .NET only.
If we want to shift to .NET for good, we have a choice here.
I always love to have choices. That's something VB guys never had!! :)
Regards,
Sarah
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What this mean for Borland?
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: What this mean for Borland?
- References:
- What this mean for Borland?
- From: Murat Ak
- Re: What this mean for Borland?
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: What this mean for Borland?
- From: marc hoffman
- Re: What this mean for Borland?
- From: Bob Dawson
- Re: What this mean for Borland?
- From: marc hoffman
- What this mean for Borland?
- Prev by Date: Re: What this mean for Borland?
- Next by Date: Re: What this mean for Borland?
- Previous by thread: Re: What this mean for Borland?
- Next by thread: Re: What this mean for Borland?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|