Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: "David Clegg" <dclegg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Apr 2006 16:08:58 -0700
Dan Barclay wrote:
I take it that there just isn't a way to do it.
No, sub-procedures always have to be declared before the procedure
body. Is there any reason why you can't use a normal procedure instead?
Then you can put it anywhere you want, and you can stop all that blood
rushing to your head.
--
Cheers,
David Clegg
dclegg@xxxxxxxxx
http://cc.borland.com/Author.aspx?ID=72299
QualityCentral. The best way to bug Borland about bugs.
http://qc.borland.com
"Hello? Operator! Give me the number for 911!" - Homer Simpson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- References:
- Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Trevor de Koekkoek
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Larry Maturo
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Brion L. Webster
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: David Clegg
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Dan Barclay
- Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Prev by Date: Re: An Interesting Coincidence
- Next by Date: Re: Version Control Advice
- Previous by thread: Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Next by thread: Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Index(es):