Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: "Dan Barclay" <Dan@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 23:06:06 -0500
"Chris Burrows" <cfbsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44349071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dan Barclay" <Dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44344978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I did try to declare them, then put them down below with no success. I
take it that there just isn't a way to do it.
Died-in-the-wool *Pascal* programmers *expect* the procedure body to be
defined before it is used. Anything else is a habit gained from use of
other languages and is confusing unless used consistently. The true
intention of the 'forward' keyword was just to handle the exceptional case
of mutually recursive procedures (i.e. a calls b and b calls a).
1. I'm not a died in the wool Pascal programmer (you probably knew that).
2. Heck, all of my code is exceptional <g,d&r>
Dan <of course there are all kinds of exceptions>
.
- References:
- Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Trevor de Koekkoek
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Larry Maturo
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Brion L. Webster
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: David Clegg
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Dan Barclay
- Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- From: Chris Burrows
- Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Prev by Date: Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Next by Date: Re: Coincidence - I think not!
- Previous by thread: Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Next by thread: Re: Visual Studio Information for Borland Delphi Customers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|