Re: Generics + D2007/win32

For our development the introduction of Win32-Generics would be a big
advantage and a reason to switch fast to D2007.

I use generics in dotnet 2 all of the time and now can't think how I got
along without them :-)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Generics + D2007/win32
    ... big advantage and a reason to switch fast to D2007. ... What is it you're doing that requires generics? ... It's just a useful tool. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Generics + D2007/win32
    ... advantage and a reason to switch fast to D2007. ... I still just don't "get" generics. ... What am I missing? ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Compiler Error CS0702
    ... So I see no reason for the spec to ... I have also pointed out that the specification does specifically disallow the use of System.Enum as a constraint, contrary to your statements that it doesn't. ... As is the case for any value type, assigning an instance of the value type to a reference type variable requires boxing. ... generics treat value type parameters differently from reference type parameters. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Wasnt dotNet supposed to be a multi-platform alternative to Java?
    ... Borland creating a Delphi Compiler for dotNet for one reason and one reason alone. ... That is, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows NT, Windows 2000, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Petition again MS
    ... searching the UseNet archives uncovers the post and tries the replied ... So imagine how confusing it would get for more complex coding issues. ... earlier while dotnet got their own new ones (and why dotnet questions get ... Is the reason some dotnetters come to the classic VB groups to troll and ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)